Nitrate Paradigm Does Not Hold Up for Sugarcane
2011

Sugarcane's Nitrate Use and Efficiency

publication Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Robinson Nicole, Brackin Richard, Vinall Kerry, Soper Fiona, Holst Jirko, Gamage Harshi, Paungfoo-Lonhienne Chanyarat, Rennenberg Heinz, Lakshmanan Prakash, Schmidt Susanne

Primary Institution: School of Agriculture and Food Science, The University of Queensland

Hypothesis

Sugarcane resembles other giant tropical grasses which inhibit the production of nitrate in soil and differ from related grain crops with a confirmed ability to use nitrate.

Conclusion

Sugarcane prefers ammonium over nitrate, which limits its ability to utilize high nitrate concentrations in fertilized soils.

Supporting Evidence

  • Sugarcane has a low capacity to store nitrate in shoots.
  • Nitrate was a minor contributor to the total N pool in Saccharum species.
  • Sugarcane's preference for ammonium leads to inefficient use of nitrate.

Takeaway

Sugarcane doesn't like to use nitrate for food; it prefers ammonium, which can lead to problems with fertilizer use.

Methodology

The study used various experimental approaches including inert-substrate and soil cultures to assess nitrate and ammonium uptake.

Limitations

The study may not account for all environmental factors affecting nitrogen uptake in different sugarcane varieties.

Statistical Information

P-Value

p<0.001

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1371/journal.pone.0019045

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication