The adult film industry: Time to regulate?
2007

The Adult Film Industry: Time to Regulate?

Sample size: 825 publication Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Corita R Grudzen, Peter R Kerndt

Primary Institution: University of California, Los Angeles

Hypothesis

The adult film industry is putting the health of its employees at risk by insisting that they work without condoms.

Conclusion

The study highlights the need for regulation in the adult film industry to protect performers from sexually transmitted diseases.

Supporting Evidence

  • Performers typically earn $400–$1,000 per shoot and are not compensated based on distribution or sales.
  • Condom use is reportedly low in heterosexual adult films—approximately 17% for adult performers.
  • Between January 2003 and March 2005, approximately 976 performers were reported with 1,153 positive STD test results.
  • A meta-analysis suggests that condoms are 90%–95% effective in preventing HIV transmission.
  • Regulation of the industry has been limited to prevention of child pornography.

Takeaway

The adult film industry often requires performers to work without condoms, which can lead to the spread of diseases like HIV.

Limitations

The study does not provide comprehensive data on all sexually transmitted diseases affecting performers.

Participant Demographics

The study involved adult film performers, primarily in Los Angeles County.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1371/journal.pmed.0040126

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication