Comparing Laser and Conventional Methods for Wisdom Tooth Removal
Author Information
Author(s): Popa Paul Șerban, Popa-Cazacu Elisabeta Claudia, Zaharescu Anamaria, Popa Gabriel Valeriu, Matei Mădălina Nicoleta
Primary Institution: Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, ”Dunărea de Jos” University of Galați, Romania
Hypothesis
Laser-assisted third molar extraction will result in significantly lower levels of oxidative stress biomarkers compared with conventional extraction methods.
Conclusion
Laser-assisted surgery significantly reduces oxidative stress and promotes faster recovery compared to conventional methods.
Supporting Evidence
- Postoperative oxidative stress increased in both groups, but was significantly higher in the conventional surgery group at 48 and 72 hours.
- Salivary biomarkers of oxidative stress were significantly lower in the laser group at 48 and 72 hours post-surgery.
- By 168 hours, biomarker levels in the laser group had nearly returned to baseline, while levels in the conventional group remained elevated.
Takeaway
This study shows that using lasers to remove wisdom teeth can help people heal faster and feel better afterward than traditional methods.
Methodology
154 patients aged 16–30 were divided into two groups: conventional surgery (n=75) and laser-assisted surgery (n=79). Saliva samples were collected at multiple time points to measure oxidative stress biomarkers.
Potential Biases
Variability in patients' baseline oxidative stress levels could influence postoperative measurements.
Limitations
The study excluded smokers and patients with chronic conditions, which may limit the generalizability of the findings.
Participant Demographics
Patients aged 16 to 30, with good oral hygiene, undergoing third molar extractions.
Statistical Information
P-Value
p<0.05
Statistical Significance
p<0.05
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website