Self-harm-related mental health presentations to emergency departments by children and young people from culturally and linguistically diverse groups in South Western Sydney
2024

Self-harm in Children and Young People from Diverse Backgrounds

Sample size: 7789 publication 10 minutes Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): John James Rufus, Khan Jahidur Rahman, Middleton Paul M., Huang Yao, Lin Daniel Ping-I, Hu Nan, Jalaludin Bin, Chay Paul, Lingam Raghu, Eapen Valsamma

Primary Institution: School of Clinical Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

Hypothesis

There will be a significant association between self-harm-related mental health emergency department presentations and CALD status.

Conclusion

CYP from CALD backgrounds had lower odds of self-harm-related mental health presentations compared to those from non-CALD backgrounds.

Supporting Evidence

  • Self-harm accounted for 31.5% of mental health-related emergency department presentations.
  • CYP from CALD backgrounds made only 8% of self-harm-related presentations.
  • 63% of self-harm-related presentations came from the two most socioeconomically disadvantaged areas.
  • During the COVID-19 period, self-harm-related presentations increased to 35.7%.

Takeaway

The study looked at kids who hurt themselves and found that those from different cultural backgrounds were less likely to go to the hospital for help.

Methodology

The study analyzed electronic medical records of mental health-related emergency department presentations by CYP aged 10 to 18 years in six public hospitals from January 2016 to March 2022 using multilevel logistic regression.

Potential Biases

Potential bias due to unmeasured confounders and the definition of CALD status.

Limitations

The study is limited to data from six public hospitals and does not account for community encounters or other hospitals.

Participant Demographics

CYP aged 10 to 17 years, with 63.2% female and 9.2% from CALD backgrounds.

Statistical Information

P-Value

0.81

Confidence Interval

0.66–0.99

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1192/bjo.2024.763

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication