Similarity of Bisphenol A Pharmacokinetics in Rhesus Monkeys and Mice: Relevance for Human Exposure
2011

Comparing Bisphenol A Levels in Monkeys and Mice

Sample size: 11 publication 10 minutes Evidence: high

Author Information

Author(s): Taylor Julia A., vom Saal Frederick S., Welshons Wade V., Drury Bertram, Rottinghaus George, Hunt Patricia A., Toutain Pierre-Louis, Laffont Céline M., VandeVoort Catherine A.

Primary Institution: University of Missouri–Columbia

Hypothesis

How do bisphenol A pharmacokinetics in rhesus monkeys compare to those in mice, and what does this mean for human exposure?

Conclusion

BPA pharmacokinetics in women, female monkeys, and mice is very similar, suggesting that total daily human exposure is much higher than previously assumed.

Supporting Evidence

  • BPA pharmacokinetics in monkeys and mice were found to be very similar.
  • The average 24-hr unconjugated serum BPA concentration was 0.5 ng/mL in both monkeys and mice.
  • Daily human exposure to BPA is likely much higher than previously estimated.
  • Monkeys and mice cleared unconjugated serum BPA at virtually identical rates.
  • Significant differences in BPA metabolism between humans and rodents were highlighted.

Takeaway

This study looked at how a chemical called BPA is processed in monkeys and mice, finding that both clear it from their bodies at similar rates, which helps us understand human exposure better.

Methodology

The study involved administering BPA to rhesus monkeys and mice and measuring serum levels over 24 hours using liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry.

Potential Biases

Potential bias may arise from the selection of animal models and the specific doses administered.

Limitations

The study primarily focused on female subjects, which may limit the generalizability of the findings to males.

Participant Demographics

Eleven adult female rhesus macaques and adult female CD-1 mice were used in the study.

Statistical Information

P-Value

p<0.005

Statistical Significance

p<0.005

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1289/ehp.1002514

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication