Analysis of Global Research Output in Biomedical Sciences
Author Information
Author(s): Beatrix Groneberg-Kloft, Cristian Scutaru, Carolin Kreiter, Silvana Kölzow, Axel Fischer, David Quarcoo
Primary Institution: Charité, Free University Berlin and Humboldt-University
Hypothesis
The study aims to assess and benchmark research output in basic and applied sciences globally.
Conclusion
The study provides a comprehensive analysis of global research activity and output over the last 50 years, highlighting significant differences between Western and Asian countries.
Supporting Evidence
- The study analyzed 5,527,558 published items to assess global research output.
- It identified a clear dichotomy in research focus between Western and Asian countries.
- The United States was the most productive country in terms of published items.
Takeaway
This study looked at how much research is published around the world, showing that different countries focus on different topics.
Methodology
The study used Scopus and Web of Science databases to categorize and analyze biomedical research output based on organs, countries, and publication dates.
Potential Biases
The study may favor English-speaking countries due to the predominance of English-language publications in the databases used.
Limitations
The study's focus on specific organ-related terms may not represent all relevant diseases and conditions, and linguistic differences may bias publication quantity.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website