Prevention and Health Promotion Interventions for Young People in the Context of Digital Well-Being
Author Information
Author(s): Eysenbach Gunther, Selkie Ellen, Kang Harmeet Kaur, Colder Carras Michelle, Aljuboori Dahlia, Shi Jing, Date Mayank, Karkoub Fatima, GarcĂa Ortiz Karla, Abreha Fasika Molla, Thrul Johannes
Primary Institution: Johns Hopkins University
Hypothesis
What health promotion and prevention interventions have been used to promote digital well-being and prevent problematic digital media and technology use in children, adolescents, and youth?
Conclusion
Interventions to prevent problematic technology use and promote digital well-being show positive findings for effectiveness, but understanding context factors and limitations of the current evidence is vital for future research.
Supporting Evidence
- Most interventions combined approaches and included an education component.
- Synthesis through vote counting showed benefits for all forms of digital well-being.
- Both included meta-analyses reported small positive effects on reductions of screen time.
- Understanding context factors is vital for evaluating what might work to prevent problematic digital media use.
- Future research should follow appropriate reporting guidelines and include details on benefits and harms.
Takeaway
This study looked at ways to help kids use technology in a healthy way and found that many programs can help reduce problems like too much screen time.
Methodology
A rapid systematic review was conducted, synthesizing recent literature on prevention interventions targeting children, adolescents, and youth, focusing on contextual factors and translatability.
Potential Biases
Many studies did not adequately report randomization, blinding, or loss to follow-up, which could introduce bias.
Limitations
The review noted a lack of detailed reporting in studies, which impaired the ability to draw firm conclusions.
Participant Demographics
The studies included participants from 19 countries, focusing on children, adolescents, and youth aged under 25 years.
Statistical Information
P-Value
<0.001
Confidence Interval
0.75 to 0.94
Statistical Significance
p<0.05
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website