Measuring Maternal Mortality in Indigenous Populations in India
Author Information
Author(s): Barnett Sarah, Nair Nirmala, Tripathy Prasanta, Borghi Jo, Rath Suchitra, Costello Anthony
Primary Institution: UCL Centre for International Health and Development, Institute of Child Health, University College London
Hypothesis
Can a key informant surveillance system effectively measure maternal mortality in remote populations with poor vital registration?
Conclusion
The key informant surveillance system produced high, plausible birth and death rates in a remote population in India.
Supporting Evidence
- 13,602 births were identified with a crude birth rate of 28.2 per 1000 population.
- A maternal mortality ratio of 722 per 100,000 live births was recorded.
- 29% of deaths to women aged 15-49 were classified as maternal deaths.
Takeaway
This study shows a new way to track how many mothers die during childbirth in hard-to-reach areas, helping to improve care for them.
Methodology
Key informants identified all births and deaths to women of reproductive age over 110 weeks, with follow-up interviews to classify maternal deaths.
Potential Biases
Potential for intentional misclassification of maternal deaths and underreporting due to migration.
Limitations
Some maternal deaths may be misclassified, and the sample size, while large, may not be sufficient for precise measurement.
Participant Demographics
The study involved a population of 228,186, predominantly indigenous people (73%) in remote areas.
Statistical Information
Confidence Interval
591–882
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website