Utility values for symptomatic non-severe hypoglycaemia elicited from persons with and without diabetes in Canada and the United Kingdom
2008

Utility Values for Non-Severe Hypoglycaemia in Diabetes

Sample size: 205 publication 10 minutes Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Adrian R. Levy, Torsten Christensen, Jeffrey A. Johnson

Primary Institution: Oxford Outcomes Ltd.

Hypothesis

To elicit societal and patient utilities associated with diabetic symptomatic non-severe hypoglycaemia for three health states: rare, intermittent, and frequent hypoglycaemia episodes.

Conclusion

There is a demonstrable utility loss associated with hypoglycaemia, with clinical importance increasing with the frequency of episodes.

Supporting Evidence

  • Each hypoglycaemic episode was associated with a reduction in utility.
  • Respondents with diabetes reported slightly higher utility values than those without diabetes.
  • Mean utility for diabetes without hypoglycaemia ranged from 0.88 to 0.97.
  • Utility loss was clinically important with as few as ten symptomatic episodes per year.

Takeaway

When people with diabetes have low blood sugar, it makes them feel worse, and the more often it happens, the worse they feel.

Methodology

Utilities were elicited using the time trade-off method from respondents with and without diabetes.

Potential Biases

Respondents without diabetes were compensated, which may have influenced their responses.

Limitations

The study was conducted in only one city in each country, which may limit the generalizability of the findings.

Participant Demographics

51 respondents with diabetes in Canada, 79 without diabetes in Canada, and 75 without diabetes in the UK.

Statistical Information

P-Value

0.0032 for respondents without diabetes, 0.0033 for respondents with diabetes.

Confidence Interval

[0.67–1.00] for diabetes, [0.69–1.00] for rare hypoglycaemia, [0.63–1.00] for intermittent hypoglycaemia, [0.42–1.00] for frequent hypoglycaemia.

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1186/1477-7525-6-73

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication