Patient-reported outcomes are superior in patients with Type 2 diabetes treated with liraglutide as compared with exenatide, when added to metformin, sulphonylurea or both: results from a randomized, open-label study
2011

Liraglutide vs Exenatide for Type 2 Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction

Sample size: 379 publication 10 minutes Evidence: high

Author Information

Author(s): Wolfgang E. Schmidt, J. S. Christiansen, M. Hammer, M. J. Zychma, J. B. Buse

Primary Institution: Department of Medicine I, St Josef Hospital, Ruhr University of Bochum Medical School

Hypothesis

Does liraglutide improve patient-reported outcomes compared to exenatide in Type 2 diabetes patients?

Conclusion

Patients reported significantly higher treatment satisfaction with liraglutide compared to exenatide.

Supporting Evidence

  • Patients reported a change in overall treatment satisfaction score of 4.71 with liraglutide compared to 1.66 with exenatide.
  • 91% of patients in the liraglutide group were satisfied with their treatment compared to 82% in the exenatide group.
  • Significant improvements in treatment satisfaction were observed across multiple DTSQ items with liraglutide.

Takeaway

This study shows that people with Type 2 diabetes feel happier with their treatment when they use liraglutide instead of exenatide.

Methodology

Patients with Type 2 diabetes were randomized to receive either liraglutide or exenatide for 26 weeks, followed by a 14-week extension phase where all received liraglutide.

Potential Biases

Potential bias due to the open-label nature of the study.

Limitations

The open-label design may introduce bias, and patient-reported outcomes are subjective.

Participant Demographics

Patients aged 18–80 years with Type 2 diabetes, receiving metformin and/or sulphonylurea.

Statistical Information

P-Value

< 0.0001

Confidence Interval

1.73–4.35

Statistical Significance

p<0.0001

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1111/j.1464-5491.2011.03276.x

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication