Enhancing recovery and reducing inflammation: the impact of enhanced recovery after surgery recommendations on inflammatory markers in laparoscopic surgery—a scoping review
2024

Impact of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery on Inflammation in Laparoscopic Surgery

Sample size: 2047 publication Evidence: very low

Author Information

Author(s): Alves Bersot Carlos Darcy, Ferreira Gomes Pereira Lucas, Goncho Victor Gabriel Vieira, Pereira José Eduardo Guimarães, Falcão Luiz Fernando dos Reis

Primary Institution: Department of Anesthesia, BP Hospital – A Beneficência Portuguesa de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

Hypothesis

What research has been conducted on the impact of the ERAS recommendations on inflammatory markers in laparoscopic surgery, and what evidence is available regarding its effects on the immune system?

Conclusion

ERAS recommendations appear to beneficially modulate inflammatory responses in laparoscopic surgery, suggesting a potential for enhanced recovery outcomes.

Supporting Evidence

  • ERAS guidelines could mitigate the inflammatory response, evidenced by reduced levels of CRP and IL-6.
  • Findings consistently showed that ERAS recommendations lead to fewer postoperative complications.
  • Most studies focused on laparoscopic colorectal surgeries.

Takeaway

This study looked at how certain guidelines can help patients recover better after laparoscopic surgery by reducing inflammation in their bodies.

Methodology

This scoping review analyzed studies from databases like PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Library, including randomized controlled trials and observational studies.

Potential Biases

There were risks of bias due to insufficient blinding of surgical teams and reliance on a limited number of small-scale studies.

Limitations

The evidence is currently limited by the small number of studies and inherent methodological biases.

Participant Demographics

The studies involved both male and female participants, with the ERAS group having a mean age of 59.7 years compared to 49.7 years in the control group.

Statistical Information

P-Value

p=0.02

Confidence Interval

−47.05 to −4.91

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.3389/fsurg.2024.1450434

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication