Carotid Artery Injury from an Airgun Pellet: A Case Report
Author Information
Author(s): Abad Syed, Ian DS McHenry, Lachlan M Carter, David A Mitchell
Primary Institution: Maxillofacial Surgery, Pinderfields General Hospital, Wakefield, UK
Hypothesis
Airguns should be governed by the same law that applies to firearms due to their potential to cause serious injuries.
Conclusion
Airguns can inflict serious injuries, and their regulation needs to be reconsidered to prevent such incidents.
Supporting Evidence
- Modern airguns can cause serious injuries despite being less lethal than historical models.
- The case involved a potentially fatal injury to the neck from an airgun pellet.
- Legislation in the UK does not adequately address the dangers posed by airguns.
- Airgun injuries are increasing, particularly among children and adolescents.
- Proper imaging techniques are crucial for managing airgun pellet injuries.
Takeaway
Airguns can hurt people badly, just like real guns, and we need to be careful with them.
Methodology
Case report and literature review.
Potential Biases
No financial or personal relationships that could bias the work were reported.
Limitations
The patient could not be traced for consent, and long-term follow-up was not possible.
Participant Demographics
A 20-year-old male.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website