Impact of quality circles for improvement of asthma care: results of a randomized controlled trial
2008

Improving Asthma Care with Quality Circles

Sample size: 256 publication 10 minutes Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Antonius Schneider, Michel Wensing, Kathrin Biessecker, Renate Quinzler, Petra Kaufmann-Kolle, Joachim Szecsenyi

Primary Institution: University Hospital of Heidelberg

Hypothesis

Are quality circles effective in improving asthma care through feedback and benchmarking?

Conclusion

Quality circles using individualized feedback can effectively improve asthma care outcomes.

Supporting Evidence

  • Guideline adherence in drug treatment increased.
  • Delivery of individual emergency plans increased significantly.
  • Unscheduled emergency visits decreased after the intervention.

Takeaway

Doctors worked together in groups to help each other improve asthma care, and it made things better for patients.

Methodology

A randomized controlled trial with 12 quality circles involving 96 general practitioners and 256 patients.

Potential Biases

Potential overestimation of effectiveness due to high workload and non-responders being healthier.

Limitations

Only 43 out of 96 practices participated, which may have led to selection bias.

Participant Demographics

Average age of participants was 56.8 years, with 62.5% female.

Statistical Information

P-Value

P = 0.02

Confidence Interval

95% CI 0.07–0.89

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1111/j.1365-2753.2007.00827.x

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication