Systemic vasoconstriction and mortality in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction: A cohort of patients who underwent non-invasive hemodynamic monitoring
2024

Systemic Vasoconstriction and Mortality in Heart Failure Patients

Sample size: 58 publication Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Marcelo Eidi Ochiai, Kelly Regina Vieira Novaes, Lucas Hideki Kato Myakava, Marcelo Villaça Lima, Euler Cristovan Brancalhão, Juliano Novaes Cardoso, Solange de Sousa Andrade, Wilson Jacob Filho, Antonio Carlos Pereira Barretto

Primary Institution: Heart Institute (InCor), University of São Paulo, São Paulo City, SP, Brazil

Hypothesis

This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic significance of systemic vasoconstriction in patients with decompensated heart failure with a reduced ejection fraction.

Conclusion

Non-invasive hemodynamic monitoring identifies systemic vasoconstriction, which is associated with poor prognosis in patients with advanced heart failure and reduced ejection fraction.

Supporting Evidence

  • 87.9% of patients died over an average follow-up of 29 months.
  • High systemic vascular resistance indices were predictive of mortality with a relative risk of 3.9.
  • Patients with higher systemic vascular resistance had worse renal function and higher serum BNP levels.

Takeaway

Doctors can use a special test to see how blood vessels are working in heart failure patients, which helps predict who might get worse.

Methodology

Patients hospitalized for decompensated heart failure with a left ventricular ejection fraction of < 40% underwent non-invasive hemodynamic monitoring using the Modelflow method.

Limitations

The sample size was small and included patients with advanced heart failure, characterized by a high mortality rate.

Participant Demographics

58 patients (71% men) with a mean age of 58.9 years, an ejection fraction of 23.4%, and 43% with Chagas disease.

Statistical Information

P-Value

0.037

Confidence Interval

95% CI = 1.1–13.9

Statistical Significance

p=0.037

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1371/journal.pone.0312582

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication