Serosurvey of Rickettsia spp. and Ehrlichia canis in Dogs from Shelters in Sicily (Southern Italy)
2024

Serosurvey of Rickettsia spp. and Ehrlichia canis in Dogs from Shelters in Sicily

Sample size: 1287 publication 10 minutes Evidence: high

Author Information

Author(s): Di Bella Santina, Gambino Delia, Pepe Davide, Gentile Antonino, Blanda Valeria, Valenti Antonio, Santangelo Francesco, Ballatore Antonino, Spina Giuseppe, Barbaccia Giuseppe, Cannella Vincenza, Cassata Giovanni, Guercio Annalisa

Primary Institution: Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale della Sicilia

Hypothesis

What is the seroprevalence of Rickettsia spp. and Ehrlichia canis in shelter dogs in Sicily?

Conclusion

The study found high seroprevalence rates of 41.8% for Rickettsia spp. and 24.5% for E. canis among shelter dogs in Sicily.

Supporting Evidence

  • 41.8% of dogs were positive for Rickettsia spp.
  • 24.5% of dogs were positive for E. canis.
  • 14% of dogs tested positive for both pathogens.
  • Older dogs showed higher seroprevalence rates.
  • Climatic differences influenced seroprevalence rates.

Takeaway

This study looked at sick dogs in shelters and found that many of them had been exposed to certain germs that can make both dogs and people sick.

Methodology

A serological survey was conducted on 1287 dogs from two shelters, assessing exposure to Rickettsia spp. and E. canis through blood tests.

Potential Biases

The lack of medical history for the dogs may introduce uncertainty in diagnostic interpretation.

Limitations

The study did not collect ticks for analysis as dogs were treated with acaricides before entering the shelter.

Participant Demographics

Of the 1287 dogs, 55.8% were male, 44.1% were female, 29.8% were younger than one year, and 70.1% were older than one year.

Statistical Information

P-Value

p < 0.0001

Confidence Interval

95% CI: 39.4–44.4% for Rickettsia spp., 95% CI: 22.2–26.9% for E. canis

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.3390/pathogens13121119

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication