Cost Analysis of Teledermatology vs Traditional Appointments
Author Information
Author(s): Nizar Nurul Ain, Roopa Farooki, Piyush Mahapatra, Saul Halpern, Tim C. H. Hoogenboom
Primary Institution: Open Medical Ltd, London, UK
Hypothesis
Does a community-based teledermatology model reduce patient costs and time compared to traditional outpatient appointments?
Conclusion
The community-based teledermatology model is cheaper and more convenient for patients, especially those from deprived backgrounds.
Supporting Evidence
- The teledermatology model saved patients an average of 58.4 minutes compared to traditional clinics.
- Patients saved £17.90 per diagnosis with the teledermatology model.
- Time savings were greater for patients from more deprived regions.
Takeaway
This study shows that using teledermatology saves patients time and money compared to going to a regular clinic.
Methodology
A retrospective cost analysis comparing time and monetary expenses of patients using teledermatology versus traditional appointments.
Potential Biases
Potential bias in patient demographics and the exclusion of certain patient pathways.
Limitations
The study did not account for waiting times at clinics, which could underestimate the total time impact on patients.
Participant Demographics
Patients referred for urgent skin lesion assessment, with a focus on those from deprived areas.
Statistical Information
P-Value
p<0.001
Confidence Interval
95% CI -62.3 to -54.5
Statistical Significance
p<0.001
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website