From Childhood Interpersonal Trauma to Binge Eating in Adults: Unraveling the Role of Personality and Maladaptive Regulation
2024

Childhood Trauma and Binge Eating in Adults

Sample size: 148 publication 10 minutes Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Bellehumeur-Béchamp Lily, Legendre Maxime, Bégin Catherine

Primary Institution: Laval University

Hypothesis

The study hypothesizes that childhood maltreatment and bullying will have a significant positive effect on binge eating, with personality traits and maladaptive cognitive-emotional regulation mediating these relationships.

Conclusion

The study found that childhood maltreatment is directly associated with binge eating in adults, and that personality traits and maladaptive cognitive-emotional regulation play significant mediating roles.

Supporting Evidence

  • Childhood maltreatment is directly associated with binge eating in adulthood.
  • Self-directedness was identified as a significant contributor in both mediation models.
  • Maladaptive cognitive-emotional regulation partially explains the relationship between maltreatment and binge eating.

Takeaway

This study shows that bad experiences in childhood can lead to binge eating when people grow up, and how they handle their feelings and their personality can make a difference.

Methodology

This cross-sectional study involved 148 adults with obesity who completed self-report questionnaires assessing maltreatment, bullying, binge eating, maladaptive cognitive-emotional regulation, and personality traits.

Potential Biases

The cross-sectional design prevents establishing causal relationships, and the overrepresentation of women may skew findings.

Limitations

The sample was predominantly female and lacked diversity in education, ethnicity, and socio-economic status, limiting generalizability.

Participant Demographics

The sample consisted of 28 men and 118 women, predominantly White, aged 21 to 72, with 58.9% holding a university degree.

Statistical Information

P-Value

p ≤ 0.005

Confidence Interval

[0.04, 0.16]

Statistical Significance

p<0.005

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.3390/nu16244427

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication