Comparing Cancer Detection Methods for Ovarian Cancer
Author Information
Author(s): MacDonald N, Sibley K, Rosenthal A, Menon U, Jeyarajah A, Oram D, Jacobs I
Primary Institution: Department of Gynaecological Oncology, St Bartholomew's Hospital and The Royal London Hospital School of Medicine and Dentistry
Hypothesis
How do national cancer registries compare to direct follow-up in identifying ovarian cancer cases?
Conclusion
Direct follow-up is more effective than national cancer registries in identifying ovarian cancer cases.
Supporting Evidence
- Direct follow-up identified 47 out of 49 cases (96%).
- The NHSCR identified 38 out of 49 cases (78%).
- Direct follow-up provided additional information compared to NHSCR.
Takeaway
This study looked at two ways to find out how many women have ovarian cancer, and it found that checking directly is better than just using records.
Methodology
The study used the National Health Service Central Register and direct follow-up to document ovarian and fallopian tube cancers.
Limitations
NHSCR ascertainment was incomplete.
Participant Demographics
Women from 1986 to 1993.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website