Work-related complaints of arm, neck and shoulder among computer office workers in an Asian country: prevalence and validation of a risk-factor questionnaire
2011

Work-related arm, neck, and shoulder complaints in computer workers in Sri Lanka

Sample size: 440 publication 10 minutes Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Ranasinghe Priyanga, Perera Yashasvi S, Lamabadusuriya Dilusha A, Kulatunga Supun, Jayawardana Naveen, Rajapakse Senaka, Katulanda Prasad

Primary Institution: University of Colombo, Sri Lanka

Hypothesis

What is the prevalence of arm, neck, and shoulder complaints among computer office workers in Sri Lanka, and how valid is a translated risk-factor questionnaire?

Conclusion

The one-year prevalence of arm, neck, and shoulder complaints among computer office workers in Sri Lanka is similar to that found in developed countries, and the translated questionnaire is reliable for assessing risk factors.

Supporting Evidence

  • The one-year prevalence of CANS was found to be 63.6%.
  • Mild cases accounted for 53.7% and severe cases for 10%.
  • Neck and shoulder complaints were the most common, affecting 36.1% and 34.3% respectively.
  • The translated questionnaire showed satisfactory psychometric properties.

Takeaway

Many computer workers in Sri Lanka have pain in their arms, necks, and shoulders, just like in richer countries, and we have a good questionnaire to help find out why.

Methodology

The study involved 440 computer office workers who completed a translated questionnaire assessing their complaints and potential risk factors.

Potential Biases

The convenience sampling may not represent all computer office workers in Sri Lanka.

Limitations

The study's cross-sectional design limits the ability to establish causal relationships, and the sample was a convenience sample.

Participant Demographics

Mean age was 38.2 years, with 42.7% males; participants worked at a telecommunication company in Colombo.

Statistical Information

P-Value

0.05

Confidence Interval

95% CI

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1186/1471-2474-12-68

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication