Mechanisms of improved survival from intensive followup in colorectal cancer: a hypothesis
2005

Improved Survival from Intensive Follow-Up in Colorectal Cancer

Sample size: 1679 publication Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Renehan A G, Egger M, Saunders M P, O'Dwyer S T

Primary Institution: Christie Hospital NHS Trust

Hypothesis

Factors other than salvage treatment may contribute to improved survival in colorectal cancer follow-up.

Conclusion

Intensive follow-up in colorectal cancer is associated with a 10% reduction in all-cause 5-year mortality, with some lives saved due to factors beyond salvage surgery.

Supporting Evidence

  • Intensive follow-up was associated with a 10% reduction in all-cause 5-year mortality.
  • Only 2% of the lives saved were attributable to salvage surgery.
  • The study included six randomized controlled trials with a total of 1679 participants.

Takeaway

Following up closely after colorectal cancer treatment helps more people live longer, not just because of surgeries to fix problems that come back.

Methodology

A meta-analysis of six randomized trials was conducted to evaluate the impact of intensive follow-up on survival in colorectal cancer patients.

Potential Biases

Potential bias in decisions to re-operate due to lack of blinding.

Limitations

Blinding of outcome assessment was poorly reported, and there was clinical heterogeneity among follow-up regimens.

Participant Demographics

Participants included colorectal cancer patients who underwent surgical treatment with curative intent.

Statistical Information

P-Value

0.009

Confidence Interval

95% CI: 4–16

Statistical Significance

p=0.009

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1038/sj.bjc.6602369

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication