Low back pain research priorities: a survey of primary care practitioners
2007

Low Back Pain Research Priorities from Primary Care Practitioners

Sample size: 70 publication Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Nicholas Henschke, Christopher G. Maher, Kathryn M. Refshauge, Anurina Das, James H. McAuley

Primary Institution: Back Pain Research Group, School of Physiotherapy, University of Sydney

Hypothesis

What are the research priorities of primary care practitioners managing low back pain?

Conclusion

Practitioners identified a need for more information on various topics related to low back pain management.

Supporting Evidence

  • 70 primary care practitioners participated in the study.
  • The response rate for the modified-Delphi survey remained above 70% throughout.
  • The top ten priorities included identifying patient sub-groups and evaluating treatment approaches.

Takeaway

Doctors and therapists who treat back pain want to know more about how to help their patients better.

Methodology

A modified-Delphi survey was conducted with primary care practitioners over three rounds to identify research priorities.

Potential Biases

Potential bias in responses due to the self-selection of participants who are already interested in low back pain management.

Limitations

The study was limited to practitioners in the Sydney metropolitan area and may not represent all primary care practitioners.

Participant Demographics

Participants included 8 chiropractors, 16 general practitioners, and 46 physiotherapists, mostly male with an average of 14.8 years of experience.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1186/1471-2296-8-40

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication