The incidence of myocardial injury following post-operative Goal Directed Therapy
2007

Myocardial Injury and Goal Directed Therapy After Surgery

Sample size: 122 publication Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Rupert M Pearse, Deborah Dawson, Jayne Fawcett, Andrew Rhodes, Michael Grounds, David Bennett

Primary Institution: Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary's University of London

Hypothesis

Does post-operative Goal Directed Therapy (GDT) increase the incidence of myocardial injury?

Conclusion

The use of post-operative GDT does not result in an increased incidence of myocardial injury.

Supporting Evidence

  • GDT was associated with fewer complications and a reduced duration of hospital stay.
  • Troponin T concentrations above 0.01 μg l-1 were identified in eight patients in the GDT group.
  • There were no overall differences in the incidence of elevated troponin T concentrations between groups.
  • The only factor associated with elevated troponin T concentrations was end-stage renal failure.

Takeaway

This study found that using a special treatment after surgery doesn't hurt the heart more than regular treatment.

Methodology

Post hoc analysis of data from a randomized controlled trial measuring serum troponin T concentrations and monitoring patients for cardiac complications.

Potential Biases

No attempts were made to standardize cardiac medications prior to surgery.

Limitations

This was a post hoc analysis of a small, single center trial not specifically designed to test the association between cardiac risk factors and myocardial injury.

Participant Demographics

Patients undergoing major surgery, with a mix of co-existing diseases and pre-operative cardiac medications.

Statistical Information

P-Value

0.007

Confidence Interval

0.46–0.89

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1186/1471-2261-7-10

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication