A new approach to treatment of resistant gram-positive infections: potential impact of targeted IV to oral switch on length of stay
2006

Switching from IV to Oral Antibiotics for Infections

Sample size: 211 publication Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Desai Mohammed, Franklin Bryony Dean, Holmes Alison H, Trust Sarah, Richards Mike, Jacklin Ann, Bamford Kathleen B

Primary Institution: Imperial College, London, UK

Hypothesis

Can switching from intravenous glycopeptides to oral antibiotics reduce hospital stay for patients with resistant gram-positive infections?

Conclusion

Switching to oral antibiotics could significantly reduce the length of hospital stays for patients needing glycopeptide therapy.

Supporting Evidence

  • 62 out of 211 patients (29%) could have been discharged earlier with oral antibiotics.
  • Switching to oral therapy could save a total of 649 inpatient days.
  • Patients with skin and soft tissue infections were most likely to benefit from the switch.

Takeaway

If patients can switch from IV antibiotics to oral ones, they can go home sooner and avoid staying in the hospital for a long time.

Methodology

Patients prescribed IV glycopeptides for 5 days or more were evaluated for suitability to switch to oral antibiotics using logistic regression.

Potential Biases

Potential bias in patient selection and criteria for discharge may affect the results.

Limitations

The study did not account for all possible factors affecting discharge timing, such as other infections or logistical issues.

Participant Demographics

Of the 211 patients, 38% were female, and the majority were prescribed vancomycin.

Statistical Information

P-Value

p<0.001

Statistical Significance

p<0.001

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1186/1471-2334-6-94

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication