Bird Ancestors and the Origin of Flight
Author Information
Author(s): T. Alexander Dececchi, Hans C. E. Larsson
Primary Institution: Redpath Museum, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Hypothesis
Did non-avian theropods possess arboreal adaptations that support the trees-down model for the origin of avian flight?
Conclusion
The study finds no anatomical evidence supporting arboreal adaptations in non-avian theropods, suggesting a terrestrial origin for the avian flight stroke.
Supporting Evidence
- Non-avian theropods cluster with terrestrial mammals and ground-based birds.
- Results reject the arboreal capacity for the avian stem lineage.
- Evolutionary trends indicate adaptations opposite to those expected for arboreal climbers.
Takeaway
The study looked at bird ancestors to see if they could climb trees, but found they were more like ground animals instead.
Methodology
The study analyzed morphological characters of non-avian theropods and compared them with extant arboreal and terrestrial taxa.
Potential Biases
Potential bias in interpreting morphological data based on existing theories of avian evolution.
Limitations
The study may not account for all possible arboreal adaptations or behaviors in non-avian theropods.
Statistical Information
P-Value
p<0.0001
Statistical Significance
p<0.05
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website