Stress Biomarkers in Medical Students Participating in a Mind Body Medicine Skills Program
2011

Stress Biomarkers in Medical Students Participating in a Mind Body Medicine Skills Program

Sample size: 40 publication 10 minutes Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Brian W. MacLaughlin, Dan Wang, Anne-Michelle Noone, Nan Liu, Nancy Harazduk, Michael Lumpkin, Aviad Haramati, Pamela Saunders, MaryAnn Dutton, Hakima Amri

Primary Institution: Georgetown University Medical Center

Hypothesis

The study aims to assess the stress-reducing effects of a Mind Body Medicine Skills program by measuring physiological changes in first-year medical students.

Conclusion

Medical students who participated in the Mind Body Medicine Skills program showed lower levels of stress biomarkers compared to non-participants.

Supporting Evidence

  • Participants maintained their hormonal balance within the normal range throughout the semester.
  • The control group showed significantly increased levels of stress biomarkers during exams.
  • Salivary cortisol levels were significantly lower in the MBMS group compared to controls.
  • DHEA-S levels in the MBMS group did not change significantly, while controls showed increased levels.
  • Testosterone levels were significantly lower in the MBMS group compared to controls.

Takeaway

Students who learned stress management techniques felt less stressed during exams than those who didn't.

Methodology

Saliva samples were collected from first-year medical students before and after the Mind Body Medicine Skills program and compared to a control group.

Potential Biases

Self-selection bias may have influenced the results as students volunteered to participate.

Limitations

The study had a small sample size and lacked random assignment to groups.

Participant Demographics

Participants were first-year medical students, including 32 females.

Statistical Information

P-Value

.001

Confidence Interval

95% CI 0.57–1.60

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1093/ecam/neq039

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication