Power Spectral Analyses of Index Finger Skin Blood Perfusion in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome and Diabetic Polyneuropathy
2011

Blood Flow Analysis in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome and Diabetic Neuropathy

Sample size: 72 publication 10 minutes Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Huang Han-Wei, Jou I-Ming, Wang Chien-Kuo, Chen Pei-Yin, Wang Wen-Chi, Lin Chou-Ching K.

Primary Institution: National Cheng Kung University Hospital

Hypothesis

The study investigates the applicability of frequency domain analysis on laser Doppler flowmetry data recorded from patients with carpal tunnel syndrome and diabetic polyneuropathy.

Conclusion

The study found that diabetic polyneuropathy decreases blood perfusion, while carpal tunnel syndrome increases power dispersion during wrist flexion.

Supporting Evidence

  • DPN decreased the absolute power and relative power in some frequency bands.
  • CTS increased the power dispersion of some frequency bands during the Phalen test.
  • There was no difference in LDF results between patients with positive or negative Phalen test results.

Takeaway

This study looked at how blood flow changes in the fingers of people with two conditions: carpal tunnel syndrome and diabetic nerve damage. It found that diabetes reduces blood flow, but carpal tunnel syndrome makes the blood flow patterns more variable when the wrist is bent.

Methodology

Patients were grouped based on electrophysiological examinations, and skin blood perfusion was recorded using laser Doppler flowmetry in different wrist positions.

Potential Biases

The study may have biases related to the selection of subjects and the subjective nature of the Phalen test.

Limitations

The apparatus could not ensure a consistent wrist angle, and the study had a small sample size with potential confounding factors like age and sex.

Participant Demographics

The study included more females, with ages ranging from approximately 52 to 60 years, and a mix of diabetic and non-diabetic patients.

Statistical Information

P-Value

P = 0.01

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1155/2011/465910

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication