Psychological distress and associated factors among the attendees of traditional healing practices in Jinja and Iganga districts, Eastern Uganda: a cross-sectional study
2008

Psychological Distress and Traditional Healing in Uganda

Sample size: 400 publication 10 minutes Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Catherine Abbo, Solvig Ekblad, Paul Waako, Elialilia Okello, WIlson Muhwezi, Seggane Musisi

Primary Institution: Karolinska Institutet, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Section of Psychiatry, Stockholm, Sweden

Hypothesis

What is the prevalence of psychological distress among attendees of traditional healing practices in Uganda?

Conclusion

A significant number of attendees of traditional healing practices in Uganda experience psychological distress, influenced by factors such as poverty and family structure.

Supporting Evidence

  • 65.1% of attendees were found to have psychological distress.
  • Factors such as having more than four children and being in debt were significantly associated with psychological distress.
  • Those who visited both traditional healers and health units were less likely to be distressed.

Takeaway

Many people who visit traditional healers in Uganda are feeling very sad or stressed, and things like having a lot of kids or not having enough food can make it worse.

Methodology

Face-to-face interviews using the Self Reporting Questionnaire (SRQ-20) were conducted with 400 patients attending traditional healing.

Potential Biases

Potential bias from only including registered traditional healers and not accounting for night patients.

Limitations

The study's cross-sectional design limits causal conclusions, and it was conducted in only two districts, which may not represent all traditional healing attendees in Uganda.

Participant Demographics

Participants were primarily Basoga, with a mean age of 34.8 years, and included both males and females with varying levels of education and socioeconomic status.

Statistical Information

P-Value

p<0.05

Confidence Interval

95% CI 0.06–0.63

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1186/1752-4458-2-16

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication