Indigenous Data Sovereignty in Nunatsiavut
Author Information
Author(s): Kate M. Ortenzi, Veronica L. Flowers, Carla Pamak, Michelle Saunders, Jörn O. Schmidt, Megan Bailey
Primary Institution: Dalhousie University
Hypothesis
Researchers often fail to return data to Indigenous communities, impacting data sovereignty.
Conclusion
The study found that only 18% of research projects returned data to the Nunatsiavut Government, highlighting significant gaps in data sovereignty practices.
Supporting Evidence
- 66 out of 369 projects returned data, representing only 18% of all approved research.
- 55% of projects indicated they would share data in their initial proposals.
- An increasing percentage of projects indicated intent to return data over the decade analyzed.
Takeaway
Researchers need to share the data they collect with Indigenous communities to help them make informed decisions about their lands and resources.
Methodology
The study analyzed NGRAC-approved research projects from 2011 to 2021 to assess data return rates.
Potential Biases
Potential bias due to researchers' hesitance to return data and lack of clear communication with Indigenous communities.
Limitations
The study did not track adherence to researchers' obligations to return data.
Participant Demographics
The study involved research projects conducted in Nunatsiavut, with a focus on Indigenous communities.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website