Complementary and Alternative Drugs Use among Preoperative Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study in Italy
2012

Use of Complementary and Alternative Drugs in Preoperative Patients

Sample size: 478 publication 10 minutes Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Ersilia Lucenteforte, Eugenia Gallo, Alessandra Pugi, Federica Giommoni, Angelica Paoletti, Michele Vietri, Patrizia Lupi, Maristella La Torre, Gianluca Diddi, Fabio Firenzuoli, Alessandro Mugelli, Alfredo Vannacci, Francesco Lapi

Primary Institution: University of Florence

Hypothesis

What is the prevalence and predictors of complementary and alternative drugs (CADs) use among preoperative patients in Italy?

Conclusion

The study found that 49.8% of preoperative patients used complementary and alternative drugs, with higher usage among older and more educated individuals.

Supporting Evidence

  • 49.8% of preoperative patients reported using complementary and alternative drugs.
  • Valeriana officinalis was the most commonly used product at 19.4%.
  • Older patients (70-95 years) had a 3.0 odds ratio for CADs use compared to younger patients (18-47 years).
  • Patients with higher education levels were more likely to use CADs.

Takeaway

Almost half of the patients getting ready for surgery in Italy use natural remedies, which can sometimes cause problems with other medications.

Methodology

A cross-sectional survey was conducted using a semi-structured questionnaire administered by trained nurses during preoperative evaluations.

Potential Biases

Self-reporting may introduce bias in the accuracy of CADs usage data.

Limitations

The study relied on self-reported data, which may lead to under- or overestimation of CADs use, and did not assess clinical outcomes.

Participant Demographics

Participants were mainly female (57.7%), with a significant portion having low education levels and a high percentage being homemakers.

Statistical Information

P-Value

0.05

Confidence Interval

95% CI: 1.3–3.3 for age 48–69 years; 95% CI: 1.9–4.7 for age 70–95 years

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1155/2012/527238

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication