Clinical Use and Effectiveness of Lipid Lowering Therapies in Diabetes Mellitus—An Observational Study from the Swedish National Diabetes Register
2011

Effectiveness of Lipid Lowering Therapies in Diabetes

Sample size: 37182 publication 10 minutes Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Eliasson Björn, Svensson Ann-Marie, Miftaraj Mervete, Miao Jonasson Junmei, Eeg-Olofsson Katarina, Andersson Sundell Karolina, Gudbjörnsdóttir Soffia

Primary Institution: Department of Medicine, University of Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Göteborg, Sweden

Hypothesis

To describe the use and evaluate the effectiveness of different lipid lowering therapies in unselected patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes in clinical practice.

Conclusion

The study found that LDL-C levels in patients taking simvastatin, atorvastatin, or rosuvastatin are very similar, indicating a potential to intensify lipid lowering treatment to reduce residual risk.

Supporting Evidence

  • Patients treated with simvastatin, atorvastatin, and rosuvastatin showed similar LDL-C lowering effects.
  • 76% of simvastatin users took 20 mg or less, indicating low to moderate dosing.
  • Around two-thirds of patients reached the LDL-C target of <2.5 mmol/L.

Takeaway

This study looked at how well different cholesterol-lowering medicines work for people with diabetes, finding that many patients aren't getting enough help to lower their cholesterol.

Methodology

Observational population-based study using data from the National Diabetes Register and other national registers in Sweden.

Potential Biases

There may be selection effects due to the criteria for including patients in the study.

Limitations

The study results should be interpreted with caution due to possible selection effects and minor errors in clinical characteristics.

Participant Demographics

Mean age was around 62 years, with approximately 60% men and 10% having type 1 diabetes.

Statistical Information

P-Value

p<0.0001

Confidence Interval

95% CI

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1371/journal.pone.0018744

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication