Osteopathic Treatment for Pandemic Influenza: Questions and Considerations
Author Information
Author(s): Sanderlin Brent W, Licciardone John C
Primary Institution: University of North Texas Health Science Center-Texas College of Osteopathic Medicine
Hypothesis
Can osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT) be effectively used as an adjunct therapy during a pandemic of avian influenza?
Conclusion
The use of OMT during an influenza pandemic raises significant questions about its efficacy and feasibility.
Supporting Evidence
- Historical data from the 1918–1919 influenza pandemic suggests differences in survival rates between osteopathic and allopathic treatments.
- Only 1% of patient visits for respiratory diseases involved the use of OMT by osteopathic physicians.
- Current models predict that a future influenza pandemic could affect millions due to increased population density and travel.
Takeaway
This study talks about using special hands-on techniques to help people with bird flu, but there are many questions about whether it really works.
Methodology
The authors reviewed historical data and current practices regarding the use of OMT in treating respiratory diseases.
Potential Biases
Potential selection bias and confounding factors were noted, but not adequately assessed.
Limitations
The study acknowledges the difficulty in establishing a causal relationship between OMT and decreased mortality due to the observational nature of the data.
Participant Demographics
The study references data from osteopathic physicians treating respiratory diseases in the United States.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website