Lung cancer and passive smoking
1990

Lung Cancer and Passive Smoking

publication Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Nicholas Wald, Kiran Nanchahal, Howard Cuckle, Simon Thompson

Primary Institution: St Bartholomew's Hospital Medical College

Hypothesis

What is the effect of exposure to other people's smoke on the risk of lung cancer?

Conclusion

The study suggests that the risk of lung cancer among non-smokers living with smokers is about 50% higher than that of non-exposed non-smokers.

Supporting Evidence

  • The risk of lung cancer among non-smokers living with smokers is about 50% higher than in non-exposed non-smokers.
  • Biochemical data suggests that non-smokers living with smokers have urinary cotinine levels equivalent to smoking about 0.3 cigarettes a day.
  • Darby and Pike's estimates of risk are considered too high based on biochemical markers.

Takeaway

If you live with someone who smokes, your chances of getting lung cancer are higher, almost like smoking a little bit yourself.

Methodology

The study reviewed epidemiological studies and estimated risks based on biochemical markers of tobacco smoke exposure.

Potential Biases

The estimates may be biased due to the exclusion of certain non-smokers with higher cotinine levels.

Limitations

The study acknowledges uncertainties in extrapolating biochemical data to epidemiological data.

Participant Demographics

Non-smokers living with smokers.

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication