The effects of business practices, licensing, and intellectual property on development and dissemination of the polymerase chain reaction: case study
2006

Impact of Patents on PCR Technology Development

publication Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Joe Fore Jr, Ilse R Wiechers, Robert Cook-Deegan

Primary Institution: Duke University

Hypothesis

How have business practices and intellectual property affected the dissemination of the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) technology?

Conclusion

Despite strict patent protections, PCR has been widely adopted due to effective business practices and licensing strategies.

Supporting Evidence

  • PCR has earned approximately $2 billion in royalties for various rights-holders.
  • Citation trend analysis shows that PCR's patented status did not prevent its adoption.
  • Business partnerships and broad corporate licensing facilitated PCR's dissemination.

Takeaway

This study looks at how a technology called PCR, which helps scientists copy DNA, was shared with many people even though it was patented. Good business choices helped make it available to everyone.

Methodology

The study involved analyzing the history of PCR's development, patenting, and dissemination through case studies and citation trend analysis.

Potential Biases

Potential bias in the interpretation of patent impacts due to the authors' affiliations with the research community.

Limitations

The study may not account for all factors influencing the dissemination of PCR technology.

Statistical Information

P-Value

p<0.05

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1186/1747-5333-1-7

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication