The Balloon Analog Insurance Task: A Measure of Risk Management
Author Information
Author(s): Brian G. Essex, Carl W. Lejuez, Rebecca Y. Qian, Katherine Bernstein, David H. Zald
Primary Institution: Vanderbilt University
Hypothesis
It is unclear whether protective risk management taps into the same individual differences as risk-taking propensity measured by existing tasks.
Conclusion
The BAIT reveals that behavior on this task is related to individual differences not captured by other risk-taking measures.
Supporting Evidence
- Participants purchased more insurance on high risk trials than on low risk trials.
- The amount of insurance purchased was positively correlated with the required number of pumps.
- The BAIT showed significant correlations with self-reported risk attitudes and personality traits.
Takeaway
This study created a new game to see how much people are willing to pay to protect their money from losing it, and found that different people behave differently in this game.
Methodology
Participants completed the Balloon Analog Risk Task (BART) and the BAIT for real monetary rewards, along with six self-report questionnaires.
Potential Biases
Participants may have misunderstood the task or used different strategies, affecting their performance.
Limitations
Some participants did not show sensitivity to risk levels in the task, which may affect the validity of the results.
Participant Demographics
131 individuals aged 18-30, 53.44% female, with no history of neurological or psychiatric disorders.
Statistical Information
P-Value
p<0.001
Statistical Significance
p<0.05
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website