The effect of offering different numbers of colorectal cancer screening test options in a decision aid: a pilot randomized trial
2008

Impact of Screening Options on Colorectal Cancer Decisions

Sample size: 62 publication Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Griffith Jennifer M, Lewis Carmen L, Brenner Alison R T, Pignone Michael P

Primary Institution: University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill

Hypothesis

Does the number of colorectal cancer screening test options presented in a decision aid affect patient interest and preferences?

Conclusion

Offering different numbers of screening options does not significantly impact interest in colorectal cancer screening.

Supporting Evidence

  • Participants showed no significant difference in screening interest after viewing the decision aids.
  • Test preferences varied slightly between groups but did not reach statistical significance.
  • Out-of-pocket costs influenced test choices more for the 2-option version.

Takeaway

This study found that whether people see two or five options for cancer screening doesn't really change how interested they are in getting screened.

Methodology

Participants aged 48-75 were randomized to view either a 5-option or a 2-option colorectal cancer screening decision aid.

Potential Biases

Potential bias due to self-reported preferences and hypothetical decision-making.

Limitations

The study had a small sample size and did not measure actual test completion.

Participant Demographics

Mean age 54, 58% women, 71% White, 24% African-American, 58% with at least a 4-year college degree.

Statistical Information

P-Value

0.11

Statistical Significance

p=0.76

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1186/1472-6947-8-4

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication