Response to Criticism on Pervasive Transcription
Author Information
Author(s): van Bakel Harm, Nislow Corey, Blencowe Benjamin J., Hughes Timothy R.
Primary Institution: University of Toronto
Hypothesis
The degree of pervasive transcription has previously been overstated.
Conclusion
The study suggests that the genome is not as pervasively transcribed as previously reported.
Supporting Evidence
- The study used a large dataset with over 131 million reads.
- It was found that a significant portion of reads correspond to introns rather than exons.
- The majority of intergenic reads are located near known genes.
Takeaway
The researchers found that there are fewer active genes than previously thought, and many RNA sequences are just by-products of other processes.
Methodology
Strand-specific SOLiD sequencing of rRNA-depleted total RNA from a single cell type.
Potential Biases
Potential misinterpretation of previous studies and reliance on semi-quantitative methods.
Limitations
The study may not account for all potential functional transcripts.
Participant Demographics
HEK-293T cells were used for the RNA analysis.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website