Impact of Deprivation and Rural Residence on Cancer Treatment
Author Information
Author(s): Campbell N C, Elliott A M, Sharp L, Ritchie L D, Cassidy J, Little J
Primary Institution: Department of General Practice and Primary Care, Foresterhill Health Centre, Aberdeen, UK
Hypothesis
Does socio-economic deprivation and rural residence affect the treatment of colorectal and lung cancer?
Conclusion
The study found limited evidence that socio-economic status and rurality significantly impact treatment modalities for colorectal and lung cancer.
Supporting Evidence
- Survival from lung and colorectal cancer is poorer for patients in deprived areas.
- Patients in rural areas have more advanced disease at diagnosis.
- Deprivation and rurality may have a minor impact on treatment modalities.
Takeaway
This study looked at whether people living in poorer or rural areas get different cancer treatments. It found that while there are some differences, they don't cause delays in getting treatment.
Methodology
A historical cohort study reviewing case notes of patients diagnosed with lung or colorectal cancer in Scotland.
Potential Biases
Potential bias in treatment quality assessment due to reliance on case notes.
Limitations
The study could not assess the quality of treatment received by patients.
Participant Demographics
Patients diagnosed with lung or colorectal cancer in north and northeast Scotland in 1995 and 1996.
Statistical Information
P-Value
0.028
Confidence Interval
0.16 to 0.96
Statistical Significance
p<0.05
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website