Physician attitude toward depression care interventions: Implications for implementation of quality improvement initiatives
2008

Physician Attitudes Toward Depression Care Interventions

Sample size: 24 publication Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Rachel Henke, Ann Chou, Johann C. Chanin, Amanda B. Zides, Sarah Hudson Scholle

Primary Institution: Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School

Hypothesis

What are the barriers primary care physicians face in treating depression and how do they perceive interventions based on the chronic care model?

Conclusion

CCM-based interventions are likely to be successfully implemented as they address key barriers to care and are supported by physicians.

Supporting Evidence

  • Physicians identified six main barriers to depression care: difficulty diagnosing depression, patient resistance, fragmented mental health system, insurance coverage issues, lack of expertise, and competing demands.
  • Interventions like care managers and mental health integration were seen as helpful in addressing these barriers.
  • Physicians expressed that education about the benefits of interventions is crucial for successful implementation.

Takeaway

Doctors find it hard to treat depression because of many obstacles, but some methods can help them do a better job.

Methodology

Semi-structured interviews with 24 primary care physicians were conducted to identify barriers to depression care and assess attitudes toward interventions.

Potential Biases

Potential bias in self-reported experiences and attitudes of physicians.

Limitations

The study's sample size was limited and may not represent all primary care physicians.

Participant Demographics

42% female, ages ranged from 33 to 55 years, with a mean age of 44 years; all were family practitioners or internists.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1186/1748-5908-3-40

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication