Does interhospital transfer improve outcome of acute myocardial infarction? A propensity score analysis from the Cardiovascular Cooperative Project
2008

Impact of Interhospital Transfer on Acute Myocardial Infarction Outcomes

Sample size: 184295 publication 10 minutes Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): John M Westfall, Catarina I Kiefe, Norman W Weissman, Anthony Goudie, Robert M Centor, O Dale Williams, Jeroan J Allison

Primary Institution: University of Colorado Denver – Anschutz Medical Campus

Hypothesis

Does interhospital transfer improve outcomes for patients with acute myocardial infarction?

Conclusion

Transferred patients had lower mortality than non-transferred patients, and mortality was similar in rural and urban hospitals.

Supporting Evidence

  • 28% of patients underwent interhospital transfer.
  • Transferred patients were significantly younger and less critically ill.
  • After matching, transferred patients had better quality of care.
  • Mortality rates were similar in rural and urban hospitals.

Takeaway

When patients with heart attacks are moved from one hospital to another, they tend to do better and live longer than those who stay at the same hospital.

Methodology

Retrospective analysis of Medicare patients with acute myocardial infarction using propensity score matching.

Potential Biases

Potential confounding and selection bias due to non-random assignment of transfer status.

Limitations

Transfer and rural hospitalization were not randomly assigned, and observational studies may introduce bias.

Participant Demographics

Patients included were primarily Medicare patients, with a significant proportion being older and having various comorbid conditions.

Statistical Information

P-Value

0.007

Confidence Interval

0.76–0.84

Statistical Significance

p<0.001

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1186/1471-2261-8-22

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication