Mutual Mate Choice: When it Pays Both Sexes to Avoid Inbreeding
2008

Mutual Mate Choice in Cockroaches

Sample size: 275 publication 10 minutes Evidence: high

Author Information

Author(s): Lihoreau Mathieu, Zimmer Cédric, Rivault Colette, Tregenza Tom

Primary Institution: U.M.R. 6552 Ethos, CNRS-Université de Rennes 1, Campus Beaulieu, Rennes, France

Hypothesis

Both sexes should benefit by avoiding close inbreeding and selecting non-related mating partners.

Conclusion

The study demonstrates that both male and female cockroaches prefer non-sibling partners, leading to inbreeding avoidance and increased reproductive success.

Supporting Evidence

  • Males preferred non-sibling female lures in mate choice tests.
  • Females mated more often with non-sibling males who courted them vigorously.
  • Inbred pairs produced significantly fewer viable nymphs than outbred pairs.
  • Antennal contacts were crucial for males to assess relatedness.
  • Both sexes displayed different mate selection criteria during mating.
  • Mutual mate choice led to increased reproductive success.
  • Study provides empirical evidence of mutual mate choice in cockroaches.
  • Findings support the adaptive value of avoiding inbreeding.

Takeaway

Cockroaches choose their mates based on how closely related they are, which helps them have healthier babies.

Methodology

The study used simultaneous mate choice tests in a Y-olfactometer for males and experimental boxes for females to evaluate mate preferences based on relatedness.

Potential Biases

Potential biases in mate choice due to environmental factors were not fully controlled.

Limitations

The study did not quantify all parameters linked to reproductive investment of each sex.

Participant Demographics

The study involved gregarious cockroaches (Blattella germanica) from a laboratory stock culture.

Statistical Information

P-Value

p<0.01

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1371/journal.pone.0003365

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication