The effectiveness of Stepping stones Triple P: the design of a randomised controlled trial on a parenting programme regarding children with mild intellectual disability and psychosocial problems versus care as usual
2011

Effectiveness of Stepping Stones Triple P for Children with Mild Intellectual Disability

Sample size: 635 publication Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Kleefman Marijke, Jansen Daniƫlle EMC, Reijneveld Sijmen A

Primary Institution: University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen

Hypothesis

Does the Stepping Stones Triple P parenting program effectively reduce psychosocial problems in children with mild intellectual disabilities compared to care as usual?

Conclusion

The study aims to provide evidence on the effectiveness of the Stepping Stones Triple P program in reducing psychosocial problems in children with mild intellectual disabilities.

Supporting Evidence

  • Children with mild intellectual disabilities often face psychosocial problems.
  • Improving parenting skills can reduce both child psychosocial problems and parental stress.
  • Stepping Stones Triple P is designed to enhance parenting knowledge and skills.

Takeaway

This study is trying to see if a special parenting program can help kids with mild intellectual disabilities feel better and have less trouble at home and school.

Methodology

The study will be a Randomised Controlled Trial comparing the Stepping Stones Triple P program to Care as Usual, with assessments before, immediately after, and six months after the intervention.

Potential Biases

There may be risks of selection and allocation bias, as well as potential biases due to non-response from parents with lower incomes or more family problems.

Limitations

Potential selective dropout and non-response may bias results, and the follow-up period is short at six months.

Participant Demographics

Parents of children aged 5-12 years with an IQ of 50-85, living in the Northern provinces of the Netherlands.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1186/1471-2458-11-676

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication