Male Use of Female Sex Work in India: A Nationally Representative Behavioural Survey
2011

Male Use of Female Sex Work in India: A Nationally Representative Behavioural Survey

Sample size: 31040 publication 10 minutes Evidence: high

Author Information

Author(s): Gaffey Michelle F., Venkatesh Srinivasan, Dhingra Neeraj, Khera Ajay, Kumar Rajesh, Arora Paul, Nagelkerke Nico, Jha Prabhat

Primary Institution: Centre for Global Health Research, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital and Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto

Hypothesis

Heterosexual transmission of HIV in India is driven by the male use of female sex workers (FSW), but few studies have examined the factors associated with using FSW.

Conclusion

In 2006, over 8 million men aged 15-49 years in India had at least one female sex worker partner in the preceding year, with higher prevalence in high-HIV states.

Supporting Evidence

  • About 4% of men used female sex workers in the previous year, representing about 8.5 million clients.
  • Unmarried men were far more likely than married men to use female sex workers overall.
  • FSW use was higher among men in high-HIV states than in low-HIV states.

Takeaway

The study found that many men in India use female sex workers, especially in areas with high HIV rates, which can spread HIV to their wives.

Methodology

The study used multi-stage, stratified cluster sampling to select a nationally representative sample of men aged 15-49 years and analyzed data from surveys conducted by India's National AIDS Control Organisation.

Potential Biases

Men, especially unmarried men, may exaggerate their non-regular partner use, which could skew the results.

Limitations

The study may be affected by social desirability bias, leading to potential over-reporting of non-regular partners and female sex worker use.

Participant Demographics

The study included 31,040 men aged 15-49 years from various states in India, with a focus on high-HIV and low-HIV regions.

Statistical Information

P-Value

0.0001

Confidence Interval

95% CI 11.4–12.2

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1371/journal.pone.0022704

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication