Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with Internal Brace Augmentation Results in Fewer Reruptures Compared to Reconstruction without Augmentation
2024

ACL Reconstruction with Internal Brace Augmentation Reduces Reruptures

Sample size: 110 publication Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): João Victor Novaretti, Claudio Paula Pessoa Dias Junior, Lucas Santos Lima, Joicemar Tarouco Amaro, Daniel Esperante Gomes, Moises Cohen

Primary Institution: Universidade Federal de São Paulo

Hypothesis

ACL reconstruction with internal brace augmentation would result in fewer reruptures and better functional scores when compared to ACL reconstruction without internal brace augmentation.

Conclusion

Fewer cases of ACL rerupture were observed after reconstruction with internal brace augmentation compared to reconstruction without augmentation, although no differences in functional scores were found.

Supporting Evidence

  • The group with internal brace augmentation had a lower rerupture rate (1.8%) compared to the group without augmentation (7.3%).
  • Both groups showed significant improvement in Lysholm scores postoperatively.
  • Complications were similar between both groups, with no significant differences in rates of arthrofibrosis or infection.

Takeaway

This study found that using an internal brace during ACL surgery helps prevent the ligament from tearing again, but it doesn't make patients feel better afterward compared to traditional surgery.

Methodology

Data from patients who underwent ACL reconstruction with hamstring and quadriceps tendon autografts, with a minimum follow-up of one year, were collected and analyzed retrospectively.

Limitations

The study was retrospective and patients were not randomized; some patients did not return for the one-year clinical evaluation.

Participant Demographics

Patients aged between 16 and 63 years (mean of 32.7 ± 11.4 years); 36.3% female and 63.7% male.

Statistical Information

P-Value

p=0.363

Statistical Significance

p>0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1055/s-00042410

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication