Functional proteomics can define prognosis and predict pathologic complete response in patients with breast cancer
2011

Functional Proteomics for Breast Cancer Prognosis

Sample size: 712 publication 10 minutes Evidence: high

Author Information

Author(s): Gonzalez-Angulo Ana M, Hennessy Bryan T, Meric-Bernstam Funda, Sahin Aysegul, Liu Wenbin, Ju Zhenlin, Carey Mark S, Myhre Simen, Speers Corey, Deng Lei, Broaddus Russell, Lluch Ana, Aparicio Sam, Brown Powel, Pusztai Lajos, Symmans W Fraser, Alsner Jan, Overgaard Jens, Borresen-Dale Anne-Lise, Hortobagyi Gabriel N, Coombes Kevin R, Mills Gordon B

Primary Institution: The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

Hypothesis

Functional proteomics can improve breast cancer classification and predict pathological complete response in patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy.

Conclusion

A 10-protein biomarker panel was developed that classifies breast cancer into prognostic groups, potentially aiding in patient management.

Supporting Evidence

  • Six breast cancer subgroups were identified by a 10-protein biomarker panel.
  • The 10-protein score was associated with recurrence-free survival in both training and test sets.
  • There was a significant association between the prognostic score and likelihood of pCR to NST.

Takeaway

Scientists created a special test that looks at proteins in breast cancer to help doctors understand how serious the cancer is and how well treatment might work.

Methodology

Reverse phase protein array (RPPA) was used on tumor samples to identify protein markers associated with breast cancer prognosis.

Potential Biases

Potential biases may arise from the varied treatments affecting prognosis and response predictions.

Limitations

The study's findings may be limited by the diverse types of systemic treatments received by patient cohorts.

Participant Demographics

The training set included 712 patients with breast cancer, with a median age of 62 years.

Statistical Information

P-Value

3.2E-13

Confidence Interval

(0.65, 0.751)

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1186/1559-0275-8-11

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication