A Statistical Analysis of the Robustness of Alternate Genetic Coding Tables
2008

Analysis of Genetic Coding Tables

publication Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Kurnaz Mehmet Levent, Bilgin Tugce, Kurnaz Isil Aksan

Primary Institution: Bogazici University

Hypothesis

Is the Standard Genetic Code the most robust coding table compared to alternate genetic codes?

Conclusion

The Standard Genetic Code is not the most robust coding table, with the Flatworm Mitochondrial Code performing better in terms of robustness against mutations.

Supporting Evidence

  • The Standard Genetic Code ranked poorly among 12 coding tables tested.
  • The Flatworm Mitochondrial Code consistently outperformed the Standard Code.
  • Robustness was assessed by simulating mutations and analyzing gene survivability.

Takeaway

This study looked at how different genetic codes help organisms survive mutations, finding that the Standard Code isn't the best at this, while another code from flatworms is better.

Methodology

The study analyzed various genetic coding tables by simulating mutations in genes and assessing their survivability over generations.

Limitations

The study's assumptions may oversimplify the complexities of genetic code evolution and mutation effects.

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication