Similarities and Differences of the Soleus and Gastrocnemius H-reflexes during Varied Body Postures, Foot Positions, and Muscle Function: Multifactor Designs for Repeated Measures
2011

Comparing H-reflexes in Different Leg Muscles

Sample size: 10 publication Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Alrowayeh Hesham N, Sabbahi Mohamed A, Etnyre Bruce

Primary Institution: Kuwait University, Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, Physical Therapy Department

Hypothesis

The study aims to compare H-reflex recordings between the soleus, medial gastrocnemius, and lateral gastrocnemius muscles during varied body postures and ankle positions.

Conclusion

The study found that the H-reflex amplitudes and ratios varied significantly with body posture and ankle position, indicating different muscle activation patterns.

Supporting Evidence

  • The H-reflex amplitudes were significantly lower during standing compared to lying.
  • H-reflex amplitudes were greater during standing with the ankle in plantarflexion compared to neutral.
  • H-reflex amplitudes were less with the ankle in dorsiflexion compared to neutral during lying and standing.
  • The study provides a reference standard for comparison to patients with L5 and/or S1 nerve root impingements.

Takeaway

This study looked at how different leg muscles react when you change your position or move your foot, helping doctors understand muscle function better.

Methodology

H-reflexes were recorded from ten participants during prone lying and standing with the ankle in neutral, maximum dorsiflexion, and maximum plantarflexion positions using three-way ANOVAs for statistical comparisons.

Potential Biases

Potential cross talk in EMG recordings, although minimized by electrode placement.

Limitations

The study had a small sample size of 10 participants and did not monitor tibialis anterior muscle activity.

Participant Demographics

Ten healthy males, mean age 32.3 years.

Statistical Information

P-Value

p = .006, .009, .029 for standing vs. lying; p = .0005 for dorsiflexion vs. neutral.

Statistical Significance

p ≤ .05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1186/1471-2377-11-65

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication