Nanobacteria: Facts or fancies?
2007

Nanobacteria: Facts or Fancies?

publication Evidence: low

Author Information

Author(s): Urbano Pasquale, Urbano Francesco

Primary Institution: The Scripps Research Institute, United States of America

Hypothesis

Are nanobacteria a new form of life that can infect and damage other beings?

Conclusion

The existence and pathogenic role of nanobacteria remain highly controversial and unproven.

Supporting Evidence

  • Nanobacteria have been reported in various biological and environmental samples.
  • Many studies assume the existence of nanobacteria without definitive proof.
  • Some researchers challenge the existence of nanobacteria and their proposed pathogenic roles.

Takeaway

Some scientists think there are tiny bacteria called nanobacteria that might cause diseases, but many others are not sure they really exist.

Potential Biases

The main contributors to the nanobacteria theory have financial interests in diagnostics and pharmaceuticals related to nanobacteria.

Limitations

The evidence for the existence of nanobacteria is largely anecdotal and lacks rigorous scientific validation.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1371/journal.ppat.0030055

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication