The Effect of Tacrine on Functional Response of the Lower Oesophageal Sphincter Assessed by Endoscopic Luminal Impedance Planimetry in Experimental Pigs
2024

Tacrine's Effect on Lower Oesophageal Sphincter in Pigs

Sample size: 6 publication Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Bures Jan, Novak Martin, Radochova Vera, Kohoutova Darina, Prchal Lukas, Martinek Jan, Mares Jan, Cerny Jaroslav, Suchanek Stepan, Pejchal Jaroslav, Voxova Barbora, Urbanek Petr, Zavoral Miroslav, Soukup Ondrej

Primary Institution: Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospital Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic

Hypothesis

Does tacrine affect the functional response of the lower oesophageal sphincter in experimental pigs?

Conclusion

Tacrine did not compromise the function of the lower oesophageal sphincter in experimental pigs.

Supporting Evidence

  • Tacrine is a non-competitive reversible acetylcholinesterase inhibitor.
  • The study used endoscopic luminal impedance planimetry to measure the lower oesophageal sphincter response.
  • Results showed an increase in luminal pressure after tacrine administration.
  • Distensibility and cross-sectional area remained within normal ranges after treatment.
  • The study is the first to assess the impact of a cholinesterase inhibitor on the lower oesophageal sphincter using this method.

Takeaway

This study looked at how a drug called tacrine affects a part of the pig's stomach. It found that tacrine doesn't hurt that part of the stomach.

Methodology

Six experimental pigs were used, and various parameters were measured before and after administering 200 mg of tacrine.

Potential Biases

There may be a risk of bias due to the small sample size and the specific demographic of the pigs used.

Limitations

The study was conducted on young adult female pigs without previous interventions, which may limit the applicability of the results to other populations.

Participant Demographics

Six experimental female adult pigs, mean weight 32.9 ± 3.5 kg.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.3390/ph17121588

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication