Swine Influenza Virus Antibodies in Humans, Western Europe, 2009
2011

Swine Influenza Virus Antibodies in Humans, Western Europe, 2009

Sample size: 435 publication 10 minutes Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Gerloff Nancy A., Kremer Jacques R., Charpentier Emilie, Sausy Aurélie, Olinger Christophe M., Weicherding Pierre, Schuh John, Van Reeth Kristien, Muller Claude P.

Primary Institution: Centre de Recherche Public de la Santé/Laboratoire National de Santé, Luxembourg

Hypothesis

Do swine workers have higher levels of neutralizing antibodies against swine influenza viruses compared to matched controls?

Conclusion

Swine workers had significantly higher levels of neutralizing antibodies against swine influenza viruses than matched controls.

Supporting Evidence

  • Swine workers had more neutralizing antibodies against pandemic (H1N1) 2009 virus than controls.
  • Antibodies against SIV and pandemic (H1N1) 2009 virus correlated with each other.
  • Controls also had antibodies against these viruses, although exposure was unlikely.
  • Further studies are needed to determine the extent of serologic responses correlating with infection.

Takeaway

People who work with pigs have more antibodies against certain flu viruses than those who don't, which means they might have been exposed to those viruses more often.

Methodology

Blood samples were collected from 211 swine workers and 224 matched controls, and tested for neutralizing antibodies against three influenza viruses.

Potential Biases

Potential bias due to the lack of detailed information from control participants.

Limitations

The difference in the timing of blood collection from controls and swine workers may affect the results.

Participant Demographics

Mean age of swine workers was 48.2 years, with 67.8% male; controls were matched by age and sex.

Statistical Information

P-Value

0.004

Confidence Interval

95% CI 7.5–10 for swine workers against pandemic (H1N1) 2009 virus

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.3201/eid1703100581

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication