Disrupted ‘reflection’ impulsivity in cannabis users but not current or former ecstasy users
2009

Impulsivity in Cannabis and Ecstasy Users

Sample size: 94 publication 10 minutes Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Clark L, Roiser JP, Robbins TW, Sahakian BJ

Primary Institution: Behavioural and Clinical Neuroscience Institute, University of Cambridge

Hypothesis

Information sampling would be reduced in the cannabis users, and this impulsivity would be further exacerbated in the current and former ecstasy users as a result of serotonin neurotoxicity.

Conclusion

The study found that cannabis users sampled less information and tolerated more uncertainty in decision-making compared to drug-naïve controls, while ecstasy users did not show significant differences.

Supporting Evidence

  • Cannabis users sampled significantly fewer boxes on the IST and tolerated more uncertainty in making the correct decision compared to the other groups.
  • The cannabis users altered their information sampling behaviour to a similar degree between the Fixed Reward and Reward Decrement conditions.
  • Regular cannabis users displayed reduced reflection impulsivity, which may impact decision-making capabilities.

Takeaway

This study looked at how people make decisions when using drugs like cannabis and ecstasy. It found that cannabis users are less careful in making decisions than those who don't use drugs.

Methodology

Participants completed the Information Sampling Test to measure reflection impulsivity, with groups including current and former ecstasy users, cannabis users, and drug-naïve controls.

Potential Biases

The ecstasy users reported moderate use of other illicit substances, which could confound results.

Limitations

The group sizes for former ecstasy users and cannabis users were smaller, which may limit the power of the analyses.

Participant Demographics

Participants included 46 current ecstasy users, 14 former ecstasy users, 15 current cannabis users, and 19 drug-naïve controls, with a mix of genders.

Statistical Information

P-Value

p<0.05

Confidence Interval

95% confidence intervals: 80–89%

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1177/0269881108089587

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication